<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Granny says:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domesticpsychology.com/2008/06/01/granny-says-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domesticpsychology.com/2008/06/01/granny-says-5/</link>
	<description>Tawdry quirk curators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:24:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://domesticpsychology.com/2008/06/01/granny-says-5/comment-page-1/#comment-42727</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticpsychology.com/blog/?p=4382#comment-42727</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that pretty much what they do now?

When I bring in the Sentinel in the morning, I (when I have time to peruse it) notice all the articles are recaps of the previous days&#039; top stories I usually already know about from the web that previous day.  But newspapers seem to have a better feel for encapsulating the stories than blogs and other online news services do - less rambling, more focused.  Of course, limited space forces one to be a better writer so that&#039;s not surprising.  I also always find a couple of surprises that I didn&#039;t see the day before, nor likely would have even if I&#039;d been looking.

I don&#039;t think newspapers need to change at all, really. By the time we get them, the news itself is old so we already know the vital stats - it&#039;s the rest of the info that&#039;s difficult to deliver online that keeps newspapers valuable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that pretty much what they do now?</p>
<p>When I bring in the Sentinel in the morning, I (when I have time to peruse it) notice all the articles are recaps of the previous days&#8217; top stories I usually already know about from the web that previous day.  But newspapers seem to have a better feel for encapsulating the stories than blogs and other online news services do &#8211; less rambling, more focused.  Of course, limited space forces one to be a better writer so that&#8217;s not surprising.  I also always find a couple of surprises that I didn&#8217;t see the day before, nor likely would have even if I&#8217;d been looking.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think newspapers need to change at all, really. By the time we get them, the news itself is old so we already know the vital stats &#8211; it&#8217;s the rest of the info that&#8217;s difficult to deliver online that keeps newspapers valuable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

