<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m a socialist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domesticpsychology.com/2008/11/18/im-a-socialist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domesticpsychology.com/2008/11/18/im-a-socialist/</link>
	<description>Tawdry quirk curators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:19:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Udder Brudder</title>
		<link>http://domesticpsychology.com/2008/11/18/im-a-socialist/comment-page-1/#comment-49071</link>
		<dc:creator>The Udder Brudder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticpsychology.com/blog/?p=4960#comment-49071</guid>
		<description>I just read his letter and my impression was different. His central points about greedy rich folks and the decline (and importance) of the middle-class are on-target. Some of the implied supporting assumptions (about redistributing the wealth, taxing the rich, etc.) are overblown right-wing talking points, but they&#039;re not central to the letter and their spurious nature is only obvious if you&#039;re paying close attention to the right... or if you know the letter writer well enough to know that *he* is paying close attention to the right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read his letter and my impression was different. His central points about greedy rich folks and the decline (and importance) of the middle-class are on-target. Some of the implied supporting assumptions (about redistributing the wealth, taxing the rich, etc.) are overblown right-wing talking points, but they&#8217;re not central to the letter and their spurious nature is only obvious if you&#8217;re paying close attention to the right&#8230; or if you know the letter writer well enough to know that *he* is paying close attention to the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

